BoD Complete Disregard for the PGR Code of Conduct

This is the PGR Code of Conduct as it pertains to the removal of members.

Code of Conduct for PGR Members

Source: https://www.patriotguard.org/content.php?163-code-of-conduct

Process to remove a member:

1) State Captain makes the recommendation for removal to the Regional Captain, and passes along all documents/facts in the case.

2) The Regional Captain will assess the information and if they believe removal is warranted will submit the request, with documentation, to Board of Directors via the Vice President for Members.

3) The member’s account on www.patriotguard.org at this point is frozen and they lose the ability to post in the PGR Forums.

4) The Vice President of Members begins an investigation into the complaint, and contacts the individual if at all possible, to get their side of the story.

5) The Vice President of Members will also contact other members of the State Leadership Team and/or fellow members if needed, to properly conduct a full investigation into the matter.

6) When the investigation is complete, the Vice President of Members will make a recommendation to the Board of Directors.

7) A vote is taken upon the recommendation.

8) After the vote, the member is contacted and told the outcome of the vote (pro or con) and whatever action(s) was recommended by the Board of Directors.

In this instance the state captain made the recommendation without documented proof. Then the regional director made a recommendation without documented proof. Then by the VP/members admission the BoD skipped down to step 7/8. They shrugged this off as irrelevant. Apparently the rules apply to everyone except leadership.
© All Rights Reserved